|
“There goes the smallest fellow in our class.”
I was crossing one of the paths that intersect the college green
of old Harvard when this remark fell upon my ears. Looking up, I
saw two stalwart Freshmen on their way to recitation, one of whom
had called the other’s attention to my humble self by this
observation, reminding me of a distinction which I did not
covet.
It was not quite true. There was one, and only one, member of
the class of ‘54 who was as small as I. Some consolation,
though not much, in that! But the air of amused compassion with
which the lusty Down-Easter, who had made me feel what the
digito monstrari was, now looked down on me, raised a
feeling of resentment and self-depreciation which left me in no
mood to make a brilliant show of scholarship in construing my
“Isocrates” that morning.
“True, I am small, nay, diminutive,” I soliloquized,
as I wended my way homeward under the classic umbrage of venerable
elms. “But surely this is no fault of mine.—Hold there!
Are you quite sure it’s no fault of yours? Are we not
responsible to a much greater extent than we imagine for our
physical condition? After making all abatement for insurmountable
hereditary influences upon organization,—after granting to
that remorseless law of genealogical transmission its proper
weight,—after admitting the seemingly capricious facts of
what the modern French physiologists call atavism, under
which we are made drunkards or consumptives, lunatics or wise men,
short or tall, because of certain dominant traits in some remote
ancestor,—after conceding all this, does not Nature leave it
largely in our own power to counteract both physical and moral
tendencies, and to mould the body as well as the mind, if we will
only put forth in action the requisite energy of will?”
This disposition to cavil at received axioms has beset me
through life. No sooner does a truth present itself than I want to
see it on its other side. If I hear the Devil spoken ill of, I
puzzle myself to find what can be said in his favor. The man who
thus halts between conflicting opinions, solicitous to give both
their due, and to see the truth, pure and simple and entire, may
miss laying hold of great convictions till it is too late for him
to act on them; but what he accepts he generally holds.
My meditations on the subject of my inferior stature led me to a
determination to try what gymnastic practice could do to remedy the
defect. For some thirty years, gymnastics, first introduced into
this country, I believe, at the Round-Hill School at Northampton,
then under the charge of Messrs. Cogswell and Bancroft, had
languished and revived fitfully at Cambridge. It was during one of
the languishing periods that I began my practice. For some five or
six weeks I kept it up with enthusiasm. Then I began to grow less
methodical and regular in my habits of exercise; and then to find
excuses for my delinquencies.
After all, what matter, if, like Paul’s, my “bodily
presence is weak”? Were not Alexander the Great and Napoleon
small men? Were not Pope, and Dr. Watts, and Moore, and Campbell,
and a long list of authors, artists, and philosophers, considerably
under medium height? Were not Garrick and Kean and the elder Booth
all under five feet four or five? Is there not a volume somewhere
in our college library, written by a learned Frenchman, devoted
exclusively to the biography of men who have been great in mind,
though diminutive in stature? Is not Lord John Russell as small
almost as I? Have I many inches to grow before I shall be as tall
as Dr. Holmes?
These consolatory considerations softened my chagrin at the
contemplation of my height. “Care I for the limb, the thews,
the stature, bulk, and big assemblance of a man? Give me the
spirit, Master Shallow,—the spirit!”
And so my gymnastic ardor, after a brief blaze, flickered, fell,
was ashes. But it was destined to be soon revived by an incident,
trifling in itself, though of a character to assume exaggerated
proportions in the mind of a sensitive boy. A youth, who had
considerably the advantage of me both in inches and in years, and
whose overflow of animal spirits required some object to vent
itself upon, selected me as the victim of his ebullient vivacity.
He began by tossing my book down stairs. This seemed to me rather
rough play, especially from one with whom I was not, at the time,
on terms of intimacy; but, making allowance for the hilarity of
classmates just let loose from recitation, I picked up, without a
thought of resentment, the abused volume, and took no further
notice of the matter. I subsequently found that it was merely the
commencement of a series of similar annoyances. This lively
classmate would even play tricks on me at the dinner table.
What was to be done? I mentioned the grievance to a friend, and
he remonstrated with my lively classmate, threatening him with my
serious displeasure. “Pooh! how can he help himself?”
was the reply which came duly to my ears.
Sure enough! How could I help myself? The aggressor was my
superior in weight and size. It was a plain case that I should get
badly and ridiculously whipped, if I attempted to cope with him in
any pugilistic encounter. But how would it do to demand of him the
satisfaction of a gentleman? True, I knew nothing of
pistol-shooting, and had never handled a small-sword. No matter for
that!
But another consideration speedily drove this scheme of
vengeance à l’outrance out of my head. Not
many years before, a peppery little Freshman had been insulted, as
he thought, by a Sophomore. The Soph, I believe, had knocked the
young one’s hat over his eyes, as they were kicking foot-ball
in the Delta. Freshman sent a challenge, the effect of which was to
excite inextinguishable laughter among the Sophs convened over
their cigars in the aggressor’s room. Amid roars, one of the
conspirators penned an acceptance, fixing as the weapon, hair
triggers,—time, five o’clock in the
morning,—place, the Delta,—second, the bearer, Mr.
M——, the writer of this reply.
It was a cruel business. A sham second was imposed on poor
little Fresh. Brave as Julius Caesar, he sat up all night writing
letters and preparing his will. Prompt to the moment, he was on the
chosen ground. An unusually large delegation for such a delicate
affair seemed to be present. One rascal who wore enormous green
goggles was pointed out to the innocent as Dr. Von Guldenstubbe, a
celebrated German surgeon, just from Leipsic. Little Fresh shook
hands with him gravely, amid the smothered laughter of the
conspirators. The distance was to be five paces; for it was
whispered so as to reach the ear of Fresh, that Soph was thirsting
for his heart’s blood. They take their places,—the
signal is given,—they fire,—and with a hideous groan
and a wild pirouette, the Soph falls to the ground.
The Freshman is led up near enough to see the fellow’s
face covered with blood, and to hear his cries to his friends to
put him out of his misery. Intensely agitated, poor little Fresh is
hurried by pretended friends into a carriage, and driven off; and
it is not till a week afterwards that he learns he has been the
victim of a hoax.
No! it would never answer for me to run the risk of being
sold in any such way as this. I must select a surer and
more practical vengeance. I thought the matter over intently, and
finally resolved that I would put myself on a physical equality
with my persecutor, and then meet him in a fair fight with such
weapons as Nature had given us both. I accordingly said to the
friend and classmate who had played the part of intercessor,
“Wait two years, and I promise you I will either make my
tormentor apologize or give him such a thrashing as he will
remember for the rest of his life.”
Thus was my resolve renewed to accomplish myself as a gymnast,
and, above all, to develop my physical strength. My previous
attempts in the gymnasium had been spasmodic and irregular. Having
now a definite object in view, I set about my work in earnest, and
went through a daily systematic practice of a little more than an
hour’s duration.
The gymnasium was kept by a Mr. Law, and, though ordinary in its
accommodations, had a good arrangement of apparatus, of which I
faithfully availed myself. The spring-board, horse,
vaulting-apparatus, parallel bars, suspended rings, horizontal and
inclined ladders, pulley-weights, pegs, climbing-rope, trapezoid,
etc., were all put in frequent requisition. My time for exercise
was generally in the evening, when I would find myself almost
alone,—while the clicking of balls from the billiard-rooms
and bowling-alleys down-stairs announced that a busy crowd—if
amusement may be called a business—were there assembled.
Naturally indolent, it was not without a severe struggle that I
overcame a besetting propensity to confine myself to sedentary
pursuits. The desire of retaliation soon became extinct. My pledge
to my friend and sympathizer, that in two years I would cry
quittance to my foe, would occasionally act as a spur in
the side of my intent; but my two best aids in supplying me with
the motive power to keep up my gymnastic practice were
habit and progress. What will not habit make easy
to us, whether it be for good or for evil? And what an incentive we
have to renewed effort in finding that we are making actual
progress,—that we can do with comparative facility to-day
what we could do only with difficulty yesterday!
Two years, while we are yet on the sunny side of twenty, are no
trifle; but for two years I persistently and methodically went
through the exercises of the gymnasium. At the end of that time I
had quite lost sight of my original object in cultivating my
athletic powers; for all annoyances towards me had long since been
dropped by my old enemy. But punctually on the day of expiration,
the friend who had listened to my pledge came to me and claimed its
fulfilment. From some evidences which he had recently had of my
strength he felt a soothing assurance that I should have no
difficulty in making good my promise.
I accordingly called on the lively young gentleman who two years
before had indulged in those little frolics at my expense. With
diplomatic ceremony and circumlocution I introduced the object of
my visit, and wound up with an ultimatum to this effect:
There must either be a frank apology for past indignities, or he
must accompany me, each with a friend, to some suitable spot, and
there decide which was “the better man.”
If he had been called on to expiate an offence committed before
he was breeched, the young gentleman could not have been more
astounded. Two years had made some change in our relative
positions. I was now about his equal in size, and felt a
comfortable sense of my superiority, so far as strength was
concerned. My shoulders had broadened, and my muscles been
developed, so as to present to the critical and interested observer
a somewhat threatening appearance. Mr. —— (who, by the
way, was a good fellow in the main) protested that he had never
intended to give me any offence,—that he, in fact, did not
remember the circumstances to which I referred,—and finished
by peremptorily declining my proposal. When I reflected on the
disparity between us in strength, which my two years’
practice had established, I felt that it would be cowardly for me
to urge the matter further, especially as it was so long a time
since he had given me cause of complaint. I have only to add, that
we parted without a collision, and that, in my heart, I could not
help thanking him for the service he had rendered in inciting me to
the regimen which had resulted so beneficially to my health.
The impetus given to my gymnastic education by the little
incident I have just related was continued without abatement
through my whole college life. Gradually I acquired the reputation
of being the strongest man in my class. I discovered that with
every day’s development of my strength there was an increase
of my ability to resist and overcome all fleshly ailments, pains,
and infirmities,—a discovery which subsequent experience has
so amply confirmed, that, if I were called on to condense the
proposition which sums it up into a formula, it would be in these
words: Strength is Health.
Until I had renovated my bodily system by a faithful gymnastic
training, I had been subject to nervousness, headache, indigestion,
rush of blood to the head, and a weak circulation. It was torture
to me to have to listen to the grating of a slate-pencil, the
filing of a saw, or the scratching of glass. As I grew in strength,
my nerves ceased to be impressible to such annoyances. Another good
effect was to take away all appetite for any stimulating food or
drink. Although I had never applied “rebellious
liquors” to my blood, I had been in the habit of taking a
bowl of strong coffee morning and night. Now a craving for milk
took the place of this want, and my coffee was gradually diminished
to less than a fourth of what had been a customary indulgence.
At last arrived the eagerly looked-for day of release from
collegiate restrictions and labors. I graduated, and the question,
so momentous in the history of all adolescents, “What shall I
be?” addressed itself seriously to my mind. My father was
desirous that I should choose medicine for a profession, and become
the fourth physician, in lineal sequence, of my family on the
paternal side.
Medicine. I cavilled at it awhile, that I might bring out to
view its grimmest and most discouraging aspect The cares, trials,
humiliations of a young physician, his months and years of
uncompensated drudgery, passed in awful review before me. I thought
of his toils among the poor and lowly, the vicious and
depraved,—of his broken sleep,—the interruptions of his
social ease,—and then of the many scenes so repugnant to
delicate nerves which he has to pass through,—scenes of pain
and insanity, of maimed and severed limbs, and all the
eccentricities and fearful forms of disease. These considerations
pressed with such weight on my mind that for a time my ancestral
craft was in danger of being ignominiously rejected by me. Indeed,
I began to think seriously of adopting a very different vocation.
And here I will make a confession, if the gentle reader will take
it confidentially.
It is a familiar fact, that every college-boy has to pass
through an attack of the rhyming frenzy as regularly as the child
has to submit to measles and the whooping-cough. A less frequent,
but not less trying complaint, is that which manifests itself in a
passion for the stage and in an espousal of the delusion that one
was born for a great actor. At any rate, this last was the type
which my juvenile malaise-du-coeur finally assumed.
I have heard of a young gentleman who, whenever he was hard up
for money, went to his nearest relatives and threatened them with
the publication of a volume of his original poems. This threat
never failed to open the paternal purse. I do not know what effect
the intimation of my histrionic aspirations would have had; but one
fine day I found myself on my way to Rochester, in the State of New
York.
My rôle of dramatic characters was a very modest
one for a beginner. It embraced only Richelieu, Bertram, Brutus,
Lear, Richard, Shylock, Sir Giles Overreach, Hamlet, Othello, and
Macbeth. My principal literary recreation for several years had
been in studying these parts; and as I knew them by heart, I did
not doubt that a few rehearsals would put me in possession of the
requisite stage-business. And yet my familiarity with the theatre
was very limited. I had never been behind the scenes. Once, with a
classmate, I had penetrated in the daytime to the stage of the old
Federal-Street Theatre, and looked with awe on the boards formerly
trodden by the elder Kean; but a growl from that august
functionary, the prompter, sent us back in quick retreat, and I had
never ventured again into those sacred precincts.
Arrived at Rochester,—which place I had selected for my
début because of its remoteness from home,—I
looked in, the evening of my arrival, to see the performances at
the theatre. It was a hall of humble dimensions, seating an
audience of five or six hundred. The piece was a travesty of
“Hamlet,” neither edifying nor amusing. A little of the
couleur-de-rose which had flushed my prospect faded that
night; but the few friends at home to whom I had confided my plans
had so pertinaciously assured me that I—the most diffident
man in the world—could never appear before an audience
without letting them see I was shaky in the knees, that I resolved
to do what I could to show my depreciators they were false
prophets.
And so I called on the manager,—with a beating heart, as
you may suppose. He was a small, quiet, gentlemanly person, whom I
regret I cannot, consistently with historical truth, show up as a
Crummles. But not even Dickens could have found any salient trait
for ridicule in the man. Frankly and kindly he went into the
statistics of the theatrical business, and showed me, that, unless
I was rich, and could afford to play for my own amusement, the
stage held out few inducements; it was barren of promise to a young
man anxious to make himself independent of the world.
I did not reply, “Perish the lucre!” but said that I
would be content, in the early part of my career, to labor for
reputation. He soon satisfied me that he could not give up his
stage to an experimentalist, and I did not urge my suit; but bade
Mr. S. good morning, and, a day or two afterwards, started for
Niagara. Here, wet by the mist and listening to the roar of the
great cataract, I speedily forgot my chagrin, and took a not
unfriendly leave of the illusions which had lured me on to try my
fortune on the stage. Even now they return occasionally with all
their fascination.
While at Rochester, as I was passing through the principal
street, I met a crowd assembled about a lifting-machine. On making
trial of it, I found I could lift four hundred and twenty pounds. I
had then been for four years a gymnast, and I supposed my practice
would have qualified me to make the crowd stare at my achievement.
But the result was far from triumphant. I found what many other
gymnasts will find, that main strength, by which I mean
the strength of the truckman and the porter, cannot be acquired in
the ordinary exercises of the gymnasium.
Returning home, I began the study of anatomy and physiology, and
in the autumn of 1854 entered the Harvard Medical School. The
question of the extent to which human strength can be developed had
long been invested with a scientific interest to my mind. One of
the greatest lifting feats on authentic record is that of Thomas
Topham, an Englishman, who in Bath Street, Cold Bath Fields,
London, on the 28th of May, 1741, lifted three hogsheads of water,
said to weigh, with the connections, eighteen hundred and
thirty-six pounds. In the performance of this feat, Topham
stood on a raised platform, his hands grasping a fixture on either
side, and a broad strap over his shoulders communicating with the
weight. An immense concourse of persons was assembled on the
occasion,—the performance having been announced as “in
honor of Admiral Vernon,” or rather, “in commemoration
of his taking Porto Bello with six ships only.” Being a
descendant myself from the Vernon family of Haddon Hall,
Derbyshire, England, I have reserved it for future genealogical
inquiry to learn whether the Admiral was connected with that branch
of the Vernons. If so, a somewhat remarkable coincidence is
involved.
I now informed my father that I intended to go through a series
of experiments in lifting. He was afraid I should injure myself,
and expressly forbade any such practice on his premises. To gratify
him, I gave up testing the question for a whole year.
But the desire re-awoke, and I had frequent arguments with my
father in the endeavor to overcome his objections.
“Look at that man,” he said to me one
day,—pointing to a large, stout individual in front of
us,—“you might practise lifting all your life, and
never be able to lift as much as that big fellow.”
“Let me construct a lifting-apparatus in the back-yard,
and I will soon prove to you that you are mistaken,” I
replied.
Finding that I was bent on the experiment, he at length gave a
reluctant consent.
It was now the August of 1855, and I was in my twenty-second
year. My first lifting-apparatus was constructed in the following
manner. I first sank into the ground a hogshead, and into the
hogshead a flour-barrel. Then I lowered to the bottom of the barrel
a rope having at the end a round stick transversely balanced, about
four inches in diameter and fifteen inches long. A quantity of
gravel, nearly sufficient to bury the stick, was then thrown into
the barrel; some oblong stones were placed across the stick and
across and between one another, and the interstices filled with
smaller stones and gravel. When I had by this method about
two-thirds filled the barrel, taking care to keep the axis of the
rope in correspondence with the long axis of the barrel, I judged I
had a sufficient weight for a first trial. I now formed a loop in
the end of the rope over the top of the barrel, and put through it
a piece of a hoe-handle, about two feet long; and standing astride
of the hogshead, and holding the handle with one hand before me and
the other behind,—straightening my body, previously a little
flexed,—with mouth closed, head up, chest out, and shoulders
down,—I succeeded in lifting the barrel, containing a weight
of between four and five hundred pounds, some five or six inches
from the bottom of the hogshead.
It was no great feat, after all, considering that I had been for
five years a gymnast. I found that I was inharmoniously developed
in many points of my frame,—was perilously weak in the sides,
between the shoulders, and at the back of the head. However, the
day after this trial, I succeeded in lifting the same weight with
somewhat less difficulty. This induced me to add on a few pounds;
and in three or four weeks I could lift between six and seven
hundred. I now had the satisfaction of seeing the stout gentleman,
whom a few months before my father had pointed out as possessed of
a strength I could never attain to, introduced to an inspection of
my apparatus. Through the blinds of a back-parlor window I watched
his movements, as, encouraged by pater-familias, he drew
off his coat, moistened his hands, and undertook to “snake
up” the big weight. An ignominious failure to start the
barrel was the result. The stout gentleman tugged till he was so
red in the face that apoplexy seemed imminent, and then he
dejectedly gave it up. The reputation he had long enjoyed of being
one of the “strongest men about” must henceforth be a
thing of the past till it fades into a myth.
In the December of 1855 I was admitted to the arcana of the
dissecting-room, and forthwith commenced some experiments with the
view of testing the sustaining power of human bones. Some one had
told me, that, in lifting a heavy weight, there was danger of
fracturing the neck of the thigh-bone; but my experiments satisfied
me, that, if properly positioned, it would safely bear a strain of
two or three thousand pounds. And so I concluded that I might
securely continue my practice of lifting till I reached the
last-named limit.
In order to get all possible hints from the inspiration and
experience of the past, I studied some of the ancient statues. The
specimens of Grecian statuary at the Boston Athenæum were
objects of my frequent contemplation,—especially the
Farnesian Hercules. From this I derived a proper conception of the
bodily outline compatible with the exercise of the greatest amount
of strength. I was particularly struck by the absence of all
exaggeration in the muscular developments as represented. I saw by
this statue that a Hercules must be free from superfluous flesh,
neatly made, and finely organized,—that form and quality were
of more account than quantity in his formation. Some years earlier
I might have been more attracted by the Apollo Belvedere; but it
was a Hercules I dreamed of becoming, and the Apollo was but the
incipient and potential Hercules. Two other statues that shared my
admiration and study were the Quoit-Thrower and the Dying
Gladiator. From the careful inspection of all these relics of
ancient Art I obtained some valuable hints as to my own physical
deficiencies. I learned that the upper region of my chest needed
developing, and that in other points I had not yet reached the
artist’s ideal of a strong man.
Good casts of these and other masterpieces in statuary may be
had at a trifling cost. Why are they not generally introduced into
the gymnasia attached to our colleges and schools? The habitual
contemplation of such works could not fail to have a good effect
upon the physical bearing and development of the young. We are the
creatures of imitation. I remember, at the school I attended in my
seventh year, the strongest boy among my mates was quite
round-shouldered. Fancying that he derived his strength from his
stoop, I began to imitate him; and it was not till I learned that
he was strong in spite of his round shoulders, and not because of
them, that I gave up aping his peculiarity.
On the 29th of January, 1856, I lifted seven hundred pounds in
Bailey’s Gymnasium, Franklin Street, Boston. The exhibition
created great surprise among the lookers-on; and at that time it
was, perhaps, an extraordinary feat; but since the extension and
growth of the lifting mania, it would not be regarded by the
knowing ones as anything to marvel at. The fourth of April
following, my lifting capacity had reached eight hundred and forty
pounds.
On Fast-Day of that year, two Irishmen knocked at my door and
asked to see the strong man. I presented myself, and they told me
there was great curiosity among the “ould counthrymen”
in the vicinity to ascertain if one Pat Farren, the strongest
Irishman in Roxbury, could lift my weight. “Would it be
convanient for me to let him thry?”
“Certainly,—and I think he’ll lift it,” I
modestly added.
Soon afterwards a delegation of Irishmen, rather startling from
its numbers, entered the yard. Among them was Mr. Farren. They
surrounded my lifting-apparatus, while I, unseen, surveyed them
from a back window. I saw Mr. Farren take the handle, straddle the
hogshead, throw himself into a lifting posture, and, straining
every muscle to its utmost tension, give a tremendous pull. But the
weight made no sign; and his friends, thinking he was merely
feeling it, said, “Wait a bit,—Pat’ll have it up
the next pull.” Mr. Farren rested a moment,—then threw
off his coat, rubbed his hands, and, seizing the handle a second
time, tugged away at it till his muscles swelled and his frame
quivered. But he failed in starting the barrel, and a burst of
laughter from his friends and backers announced his defeat.
It is now but justice to Mr. Farren to say that it could hardly
be expected of him to lift such a weight at either the first trial
or the second. A want of confidence, or the maladjustment of the
rope, might have interfered with the full exercise of his strength.
I need not say that his discomfiture was witnessed by me from my
hiding-place with the liveliest satisfaction; for I had begun to
pride myself on being able to outlift any man in the country.
In May, 1856, I received the appointment of medical assistant to
Dr. Walker, at the Lunatic Hospital, South Boston, and gave up for
a couple of months my practice of lifting. The consequence was a
rapid diminution of strength, which suggested to me a return to the
lifting exercise. Near the hospital was a large unoccupied
building, formerly the House of Industry. In the cellar of this
building I put a barrel, and loaded it with rocks and gravel as I
had done in Roxbury. Immediately overhead, on the first floor, I
cut a hole, about six inches square, and passed up a rope attached
to the barrel. This rope I looped at the end, for the reception of
a handle. On the floor I nailed two cleats between three and four
feet apart, as guards to keep my feet from slipping. Beginning with
about six hundred pounds, I added a few pounds daily, till I was
able, in November, 1856, to lift with my hands alone nine hundred
pounds.
Returning home the ensuing winter, I attended a second course of
medical lectures, and, in the routine of labors incident to a
medical student’s life, omitted to develop further my powers
as a lifter. In the summer of 1857 I became a practitioner of
medicine. In the autumn of that year, a gentleman, who had been
looking at my lifting-apparatus, remarked to me, “If you are
as strong as they tell me, what is to prevent your seizing hold of
me, (I weigh only a hundred and eighty pounds) holding me at
arm’s-length over your head, and pitching me over that
fence?” To this I replied, that, if he would give me six
weeks for practice, I would satisfy him the thing could be done. He
agreed to be on hand at the end of the time named.
In order to be sure of the muscles that would be brought into
play by the feat, I procured an oblong box with a handle on either
side running the whole length. Into the box I threw a number of
brick-bats,—then raised the box at arm’s-length above
my head, and threw it over my vaulting-pole, which was at an
elevation of six and a half feet from the ground. Subsequently I
added more brick-bats, till gradually their weight amounted to
precisely one hundred and eighty pounds. Having practised till I
could easily handle and throw the box thus charged, I informed my
challenger that I was ready for him. He came, when, seizing him by
the middle, I lifted him struggling above my head, and threw him
over the fence before he was hardly aware of my intent. As he was
somewhat corpulent and puffy, and the act involved an abdominal
pressure which was by no means agreeable, he expressed himself
perfectly satisfied with the experiment, but objected very
decidedly to its repetition.
In June, 1858, I commenced practising with two fifty-pound
dumb-bells, and subsequently added one of a hundred pounds, which I
was prompted to get from hearing that one of that weight was used
by Mr. James Montgomery, at that time a celebrated gymnast of New
York City, and afterwards a successful teacher at the Albany
Gymnasium. Not having given much attention to the development of
the extensor muscles of the arms for several months previous, it
was a number of weeks before I could put this dumb-bell up at
arm’s-length above my head with one hand. As soon as I
succeeded in doing this with comparative ease, I procured another
hundred-pound dumb-bell, and in a few months succeeded in
exercising with both of the instruments at the same time, raising
each alternately above my head. I then commenced practice with a
dumb-bell weighing one hundred and forty-one pounds. It consisted
of two shells connected by a handle, which, being removable,
allowed me to introduce shot, from time to time, into the cavities
of the shells. After a few months of practice, I could, with a
jerk, raise the instrument from my shoulder to arm’s-length
above my head. My first public exhibition of this feat took place
in Philadelphia, in April, 1860.
The spring of 1859 was now drawing nigh, and I began to think of
giving a public lecture on Physical Culture, illustrating it with
some exhibitions of the strength to which I had attained. My father
approved the venture, but, bethinking himself of my extreme
diffidence, significantly asked, when I would be ready to
permit a public announcement of my intention. “Oh, in a few
days,” I replied, as if it were as small a matter for me to
lecture in public as to lift a thousand pounds in a gymnasium.
Weeks flew by, and still to the galling inquiry,
“When?” I could only answer, “Soon, but
not just yet.” February and March had come and gone, and
still I was not ready. Finally, to the oft-renewed interrogatory, I
made this reply: “As soon as I can shoulder a barrel of
flour, a feat which I am determined to accomplish before an
audience, you may announce my lecture.”
I had then been practising some two months with a loaded barrel,
so contrived that it should weigh a little more each succeeding
day; and it had now reached a hundred and ninety pounds. About this
time it occurred to me, that, among my many experiments, I had
never fairly tried that of a vegetable diet. I read anew the works
of Graham and Alcott; and conceiving that my strength had reached a
stagnation-point, I gave up meat, and restricted my animal diet to
milk.
A barrel of flour weighs on an average two hundred and sixteen
pounds. I therefore could not succeed in shouldering one until
twenty-six pounds had been added to my loaded barrel. Day after day
I shouldered my one hundred and ninety pounds, but could not get an
ounce beyond that limit. My grand theory of the possible
development of a man’s strength began to look somewhat
insecure.
“So fares the system-building sage,
Who, plodding on from youth to age,
Has proved all other reasoners fools,
And bound all Nature by his rules,—
So fares he in that dreadful hour
When injured Truth exerts her power
Some new phenomenon to raise,
Which, bursting on his frighted gaze,
From its proud summit to the ground,
Proves the whole edifice unsound.”
JAMES BEATTIE
The shouldering of a barrel of flour is a feat, by the way,
which many an old inhabitant will tell you that he, or some friend
of his, could accomplish in his eighteenth year. Why it should
always be among the res gestæ temporis acti cannot
be readily explained. It is a common belief that any stout truckman
can do the thing; but I have been assured by one of the leading
truckmen of Boston, that there are not, probably, three individuals
in the city who are equal to the accomplishment.
The mode of life that I had hitherto found essential to the
keeping up of my strength was quite simple, and rather negative
than positive. From tobacco and all ardent spirits, including wine,
I had to abstain as a matter of course. Beer and all fermented
liquors had also been ruled out. Impure air must be avoided like
poison. Summer and winter I slept with my windows open. Badly
ventilated apartments were scrupulously shunned. Cold bathing of
the entire person was rarely practised oftener than once a week in
cold weather or twice a week in warm weather. A more frequent
ablution seemed to over-stimulate the excretory functions of the
skin, so that excessive bathing defeated its very object. The
“tranquil mind” must be preserved with little or no
interruption. Great physical strength cannot coexist with an
unhappy, discontented temper. You must be habitually cheerful, if
you would be strong. With regard to diet,—that was the very
experiment I was trying,—the experiment, namely, of going
without solid animal food. With me it did not succeed. So far from
gaining in strength, hardly did I hold my own. Suddenly I resolved
to give up my vegetable diet, and return to beef-steaks,
mutton-chops, and loins of veal. A daily appreciable increase of
strength was soon the consequence. Within ten days I succeeded in
shouldering the loaded barrel weighing two hundred and sixteen
pounds; and a day or two after I shouldered, in the presence of our
grocer himself, a barrel of flour.
I had now no further excuse for deferring my promised lecture.
The month of May had arrived. My father delicately broached the
subject of the announcement. Being a little fractious, perhaps from
some ebb in my strength, I hastily replied,—
“Announce it for the 30th of May.”
“What hall shall I engage?”
“Any hall in Boston. Why not the Music Hall?” I
added, affecting a valor I was far from feeling; but, like Macbeth,
I now realized that “returning were as tedious as go
o’er.”
Mercantile Hall, in Summer Street, was engaged for me,—it
being central, modest in point of size, commodious, and favorably
known. At this time I was in excellent health and weighed one
hundred and forty-three pounds. But from the moment of the public
announcement of my lecture, my appetite for food, for meat
particularly, began to fail me. “How peevish and irritable he
is growing!” I heard one member of the family remark to
another. Soon the grocer’s scales indicated that my weight
was diminishing. It fell to one hundred and forty-one,—then
to one hundred and forty,—then to one hundred and
thirty-eight,—and finally, when the 30th of May arrived, I
found I weighed only one hundred and thirty-four pounds!
The crisis was now at hand. Do not laugh at me, ye self-assured
ones, with your comfortable sense of your own powers,—ye who
care as little for an audience as for a field of cabbages,—do
not jeer at one who has felt the pangs of shyness and quailed under
the imaginary terrors of a first public appearance. For you it may
be a small matter to face an audience,—that nearest
approximation to the many-headed monster which we can palpably
encounter; but for one whose diffidence had become the standard of
that quality to his acquaintances the venture was perilous and
desperate, as the sequel showed.
Never had time rolled by with such fearful velocity as on that
eventful day. Breakfast was hardly over before preparations were
being made for dinner. Small appetite had I for either. Before I
had finished pacing the parlor there was a summons to tea. It was
like the summons to the criminal: “Rise up, Master
Barnardine, and be hanged.” With a most shallow affectation
of nonchalance I sat down at the table. A child might have
detected my agitation; and yet, with horrible insincerity, I
alluded to the news of the day, and asked the family why they were
all so silent. They saw from my look that they might as well have
joked with a man on his way to execution.
Having dressed and adorned myself for the sacrifice, I returned
to the parlor, when the rumbling of coach-wheels, the sudden
letting down of steps, and then a frightfully discordant ring of
the doorbell, sent the blood from my cheeks and made my heart
palpitate like a trip-hammer. “Is th-th-that the
off-officer,—I mean the coachman?” I stammered. Yes,
there was no doubt about it.
Straightening my person, I affected a dignified calmness, and
assured my dear, anxious mother that I was not in the least
nervous,—oh, not in the least!
It was a gloomy night, and the streets wore a dismal aspect. The
hall was distant about three miles; but in some mysterious manner,
or by some route which I have never been able to discover, the
coachman seemed to abridge the distance to less than half a mile.
We are in Summer Street,—before the door. Some juvenile
amateurs, attracted by stories of the strong man, surround the
carriage to get a sight of him.
“Ha! what are these? Sure, hangmen, That come to bind my
hands, and then to drag me Before the judgment-seat: now they are
new shapes, And do appear like Furies!”
The words of Sir Giles Overreach, one of the parts I had studied
during my histrionic accès, were not at all
inappropriate to the state of mind in which, with knee-joints
slipping from under me, I now made my way up-stairs. Having reached
the upper entry, I paused, and glanced at the audience through the
windows, before entering the little retiring-room behind the stage.
With an inward groan at my presumption, I passed on. To think,
that, but for my own madness, I might have been at that moment
comfortably at home, reading the evening paper! Nay, were it not
better to be tossing on stormy seas, driving on a lee-shore,
toiling as a slave under a tropic sun, than here, with a gaping
audience waiting to devour me with their eyes and ears?
The first thing I did, on reaching the retiring-room, was to
give way to a fearful fascination and take another peep at the
audience from behind a curtain at the side-entrance. I then looked
at my watch. Twenty minutes to eight! People were pouring in,
notwithstanding the inclement weather. The hall was nearly crowded
already. One familiar face after another was recognized. Surely
everybody I know is present.
Another look at my watch. Quarter to eight! Suddenly the frantic
thought occurred to me, What if I have lost my manuscript? Where
did I put it? ‘Tis in none of my pockets! Good gracious! Has
any one seen my manuscript? Come, Jerome, no fooling at a time like
this! Where have you hidden it? What! You know nothing about it?
Hunt for it, then! Wouldn’t it be a charming scrape,
if I couldn’t find my lecture? Isn’t this it, in the
drawer? Oh, yes! I must have put it there unconsciously.
Being in a high state of perspiration, and wiping my forehead
incessantly, I disarrange my hair. Where’s that brush? No one
can tell. Agony! Where’s the brush? Here on the floor. Oh,
yes! There! What a blaze my cheeks are in! The audience will think
they are flushed with Bourbon. No matter. That manuscript has
disappeared again. Confusion! Where is it? Here in your
overcoat-pocket. All right.
Five minutes to eight. Grasping the scroll, I rush to the
side-entrance. The audience begin to manifest their impatience by
applause. Suddenly I hear the bell of the Old South Church strike
eight. The last vibration passes like an ice-bolt through my heart.
Wrought up to desperation, I thrust aside the curtain. This gives a
portion of the audience a sight of me, and I hear some one exclaim,
“There he is!” Horrible exposure! I dodge back out of
view, as if to escape the discharge of a battery. A round of
impatient applause rouses me. I count three, and precipitate myself
forward to the centre of the stage.
The hall is filled,—all the seats and most of the
standing-places occupied. But I can no longer recognize any one.
Friend and foe are confounded in an undistinguishable mass; or,
rather, they are but parts and members of one hideous monster,
moving itself by one volition, winking its thousand eyes all at
once, and ready to swallow me with a single deglutition. However,
the plunge is made. The worst is over. I rallied from the shock,
and in a clear, but unnecessarily loud and ponderous voice, pitched
many degrees too high, I commenced my lecture.
For some ten minutes, if I may believe the tender reports in the
newspapers the next day, I got on very respectably. I had won the
attention of the audience. But, at an unlucky moment, a fresh
arrival of persons at the door made the monster turn his thousand
eyes in that direction. I mistook it for an indication that he was
getting weary of my talk. My attention was distracted. Then came a
suspension of all thought, an appalling paralysis of memory. Having
learnt the first part of my discourse by heart, I had been reciting
it without turning over the leaves of the manuscript; and now I was
unable to recollect at what point I had left off, or whether I had
given five pages or ten.
Frightful dilemma! Stupefied with horror, I gazed intently on
the page before me till the lines became all blurred, and a blue
mist wavered before my eyes. Then came a pause of intensest
silence. The monster lying in wait for me evidently began to
anticipate that his victim’s time was come, and so, like a
crafty monster, he remained still and patient. Who could endure a
nightmare like this? I felt myself reeling to and fro. Then a
pleasant thrill, like that, perhaps, which drowning men feel, ran
through my frame. All became dark,—and the strong man
dropped, like a felled ox, senseless on the stage.
When consciousness returned I was lying flat on my back, and
several persons were bending over me.
“Keep down,—don’t rise,” some one
said.
“What has happened?” I asked.
“Nothing,—only you were a little faint.”
“Faint? A man who can lift a thousand pounds
faint—at the sight of an audience? Absurd! Let me
rise.”
And in spite of all opposition I rose, grasped my manuscript,
walked to the front of the stage, and resumed my lecture. Alas!
“Reaching above our nature does no good;
We must sink back into our own flesh and blood.”
I had not proceeded far before I felt symptoms of a repetition
of the calamity; and lest I should be overtaken before I could
retreat, I stammered a few words of apology, and withdrew
ingloriously from public view. Fresh air and a draught of water,
which some obliging friend had dashed with eau-de-vie,
soon restored me. But I took the advice of friends and did not make
a third attempt that evening.
The audience, had it been wholly composed of brothers and
sisters, could not have been more indulgent and considerate. One
skeptical gentleman was heard to say,—
“I don’t believe he can lift nine hundred
pounds.”
And another added,—
“Nor I,—any more than that he can shoulder a barrel
of flour.”
“Or raise his body by the little finger of one
hand,” said another.
Whereupon a venerable citizen, a gentleman long known and
respected as the very soul of honor, truthfulness, and uprightness,
came forward on the stage before the audience, and with emphatic
earnestness, and in a loud, intrepid tone of voice,
exclaimed,—
“Ladies and gentlemen,—The heat of the room was too
much for the lecturer; but he can easily do all the feats announced
in the bills. I’ve seen him do them twenty
times.”
The dear, but infatuated old gentleman! He had never seen me do
anything of the kind. He hardly knew me by sight. He thought only
of coming to the rescue of an unfortunate lecturer, prostrated on
the very threshold of his career; and a friendly hallucination made
him for the moment really believe what he said. His unpremeditated
assertion must have been set down by the recording angel on the
same page with Uncle Toby’s oath, and then obliterated in the
same manner.
Ten days after the above-mentioned catastrophe, having engaged
the largest hall in Boston, (the Music Hall,) I delivered my
lecture—in the words of the newspapers—“with
éclat.” The illustrations of strength which I
exhibited on the occasion, though far inferior to subsequent
efforts, were looked on as most extraordinary. The weight I lifted
before the audience, with my hands alone, was nine hundred and
twenty-nine pounds. This was testified to by the City Sealer of
Weights and Measures, Mr. Moulton. My success induced me to repeat
my lecture in other places. Invitations and liberal offers poured
in upon me from all directions; and during the ensuing seasons, I
lectured in Baltimore, Philadelphia, Cincinnati, Albany, and many
of the principal cities throughout the Northern States and the
Canadas.
To return to my lifting experiments. I had promised my father to
“stop at a thousand pounds.” In the autumn of 1859 I
had reached ten hundred and thirty-two pounds. An incident now
occurred that induced me to reconsider my promise and get
absolution from it. One day, while engaged in lifting, I had a
visit from two powerful-looking men who asked permission to try my
weight. One of them was five feet ten inches in height, and a
hundred and ninety-two pounds in weight. The other was fully six
feet in his stockings, and two hundred and twelve pounds in
weight,—a fearful superiority in the eyes of a man, under
five feet seven and weighing less than a hundred and fifty pounds.
The smaller of these men failed to lift eight of my iron disks,
which, with the connections, amounted to eight hundred and
twenty-seven pounds. The larger individual fairly lifted them at
the second or third trial, but declined to attempt an increase.
They left me, and I soon, afterward heard that they were practising
with a view of “outlifting Dr. Windship.”
My father had incautiously remarked to me, “Those huge
fellows, with a little practice, can lift your weight and you on
top of it. You can’t expect to compete with giants.”
This decided me to test the question whether five feet seven must
necessarily yield to mere bulk in the attainment of the maximum of
human strength. I had the start of my competitors by some two
hundred pounds, and I determined to preserve that distance between
us. In the autumn of that year I advanced to lifting with the hands
eleven hundred and thirty-three pounds, and in the spring of 1860
to twelve hundred and eight. I have had no evidence that my
competitors ever got beyond a thousand pounds; though I doubt not,
if they had had my leisure for practice, they might have surpassed
me.
In July, 1860, I commenced lifting by means of a padded rope
over my shoulders,—my body, during the act of lifting, being
steadied and partly supported by my hands grasping a stout frame at
each side. After a few unsuccessful preliminary trials, I quickly
advanced to fourteen hundred pounds. The stretching of the rope now
proved so great an annoyance, that I substituted for it a stout
leather band of double thickness, about two inches and a half wide,
and which had been subjected to a process which was calculated to
render it proof against stretching more than half an inch under any
weight it was capable of sustaining. But on trial, I found, almost
to my despair, that it was of a far more yielding nature than the
rope, and consequently the rope was again brought into requisition.
A few weeks of unsatisfactory practice followed, when it occurred
to me that an iron chain, inasmuch as it could not stretch, might
be advantageously used, provided it could be so padded as not to
chafe my shoulders. After many experiments I succeeded in this
substitution; but the chain had yet one objection in common with
the rope and the strap, arising from the difficulty of getting it
properly adjusted. I contented myself with its use, however, until
the spring of 1861, when I hit upon a contrivance which has proved
a complete success. It consists of a wooden yoke fitting across my
shoulders, and having two chains connected with it in such a manner
as to enable me to lift on every occasion to the most advantage.
With this contrivance my lifting-power has advanced with
mathematical certainty, slowly, but surely, to two thousand and
seven pounds, up to this twenty-third day of November,
1861.
In my public experiments in lifting, when I have not used the
iron weights cast for the purpose, I have, as a convenient
substitute, used kegs of nails. It recently occurred to me, that,
if, instead of these kegs, I could employ a number of men selected
from the audience, the spectacle would he still more satisfactory
to the skeptical. Accordingly I contrived an apparatus by means of
which I have been able to present this convincing proof of the
actual weight lifted. I introduced it after my lecture at the
Town-Hall in Brighton, Massachusetts, on the 9th of October, 1861;
and the following account of the result appeared in one of the city
papers:—
“Standing upon a staging at an elevation of about eight or
ten feet from the floor, the Doctor lifted and sustained, for a
considerable time and without apparent difficulty, a platform
suspended beneath him on which stood twelve gentlemen, all heavier
individually than the Doctor himself, and weighing, inclusive of
the entire apparatus lifted with them, nearly nineteen hundred
pounds avoirdupois. In the performance of this tremendous
feat, Dr. W. employed neither straps, bands, nor
girdle,—nothing in short but a stout oaken stick fitting
across his shoulders, and having attached to it a couple of rather
formidable-looking chains. At his request, a committee, appointed
by the audience, and furnished with one of Fairbanks’s
scales, superintended all the experiments.”
The exact weight lifted on this occasion was eighteen hundred
and thirty-six pounds. A few evenings after, I lifted, in the same
way, in Lynn, eighteen hundred and sixty; in Brookline, eighteen
hundred and ninety; in Medford, nineteen hundred and thirty-four;
in Maiden, nineteen hundred and two; and in Charlestown, nineteen
hundred and forty.
As my strength is still increasing in an undiminished ratio, I
am fairly beginning to wonder where the limit will be; and the old
adage of the camel’s back and the last feather occasionally
suggests itself. I have fixed three thousand pounds as my ne
plus ultra.
|